•  
•  

Reviewer Guidelines

Below are the terms and requirements to be taken in consideration by the reviewer of the research sent for publication in this journal:

• Filling the evaluation form sent with the research to be evaluated accurately and not any paragraph without an answer.
• The reviewer must make sure that the titles, both Arabic and English, are linguistically identical. If not, an alternative title is to be suggested.
• The reviewer should state whether tables and figures seen in the research are thorough and expressive.
• The reviewer should state whether or not the authors use statistical methods correctly.
• The reviewer should state whether the discussion of the results is logically sufficient.
• The reviewer should determine the extent to which the authors use modern scientific evidence.
• The reviewer should clearly indicate one of the three options as follows:
  • The research is suitable for publication without modifications.
  • The research is suitable for publication after changes are made.
  • The research is not suitable for publication.
• The reviewer should clarify in a separate sheet the basic modifications suggested before accepting the article for publication.
• The reviewer has the right to get the manuscript back to him after making the necessary modifications to make sure of the authors' commitment.
• The reviewer must register his/her name, academic title, address, and the evaluation date, with the signature of the evaluation form sent, accompanied by the article submitted for evaluation.